CopySmith Review: GPT-3 Copywriting Tool Worth the Price?

What Is CopySmith?

CopySmith is one of several GPT-3 powered copywriting tools that have entered the market, all promising to help you generate sales copy, blog content, and marketing materials with the help of AI. If you've been following the wave of AI writing assistants, you'll know the space has gotten crowded fast — tools like Copy.ai, Jasper (formerly Jarvis), Writesonic, and Rytr are all competing for the same audience.

The core pitch is simple: feed the tool some basic inputs about your product or topic, and it generates multiple variations of copy for you to choose from. It won't replace a skilled copywriter, but it can be genuinely useful for pushing past writer's block and getting a solid first draft on the page. CopySmith enters this arena with a polished interface and some thoughtful features that set it apart from the competition.

**Update:** CopySmith has since shut down. This review is preserved for historical reference and to help compare it against tools that are still active in the AI copywriting space.

The CopySmith Interface and Setup

One of the first things that stands out about CopySmith is its folder-based organization system. When you log in, you can create folders and files for your projects — it feels more like working in a word processor than a typical AI tool. This is a meaningful improvement over Copy.ai, which at the time didn't offer this kind of project structure.

Setting up a new project involves entering your product name, a description, and defining your target audience (which CopySmith calls an "audience bank"). You can also add brand keywords to influence the tone of the output. The keyword field is a bit ambiguous — the examples suggest tone-of-voice words like "high quality" and "fun," but the label says "keywords," which could easily be mistaken for SEO terms. Minor confusion aside, the setup process is straightforward.

CopySmith also offers a website scraper that can pull input data from your site automatically, which is a nice touch for anyone who already has product descriptions or about pages they want to build on.

Product Description Results

The product description generator is where CopySmith really shines. After entering just a few product characteristics — not even full sentences — the tool returned around ten different product descriptions, and the quality was noticeably above average for GPT-3 tools at the time.

One output read: "Do you want to start an e-store? No problem, we've got your back. Looking for a way to sell online courses? We got you covered. If you're looking for some of the best ways to start or grow your business, then this group is for you. Don't waste time on fluff — just real life strategies that work. Join today and say goodbye to getting stuck." That's genuinely usable copy from minimal input.

Another variation positioned the product as a training program and even worked in a persuasive hook: "If you're interested in learning how to create passive income with your own e-commerce store, this could be the most important letter you'll ever read." The outputs consistently felt more polished and purposeful than what Copy.ai was producing at the time.

Useful Extra Features

Beyond the core generation engine, CopySmith packs in several quality-of-life features that make day-to-day use more pleasant. Each template includes a sample output so you can see what to expect before spending any credits — something Copy.ai was missing entirely. If you're on a limited plan and paying per generation, this kind of preview is genuinely valuable.

The sharing feature lets you create a public link to your generated copy, complete with upvote and downvote functionality. Downloads are available in text, PDF, and CSV formats, compared to Copy.ai's CSV-only option. You also get character and word count toggles directly on the output, an inline editor for quick tweaks, and a "more like this" button that generates free variations of any output you like.

There's also a built-in plagiarism checker with a limited number of checks per month. It works similarly to CopyScape and may even be using their API under the hood. Being able to verify uniqueness without leaving the app is a welcome convenience.

Blog Ideas and Short-Form Content

The blog ideas generator takes a different approach than you might expect. Rather than just spitting out a list of titles, CopySmith generates full blog concept pitches — a headline paired with an introductory paragraph. Feed it a handful of target keywords and it returns ideas like "The Ultimate List of 462 Email Marketing Resources" or "10 Types of Email Sequences You Need to Create a Killer Ecommerce Marketing Plan."

The intro paragraphs read surprisingly human. One began: "As you know, I'm a huge proponent of email to market your business. It's the most targeted, trackable, and measurable form of marketing available." That's the kind of natural, conversational tone that would fit right in on a marketing blog.

That said, not every output was a winner. A couple of results simply regurgitated the input keywords as a title, and one just said "How to" with nothing else. But the hit rate was solid — better than average for GPT-3 tools at the time, and more than enough to spark real content ideas.

The Article Writing Assistant

CopySmith's article writing assistant uses a three-step workflow: generate blog ideas, create an outline, then produce the full article. The guided process is clever — you pick a headline and intro from the first batch of results, refine them if needed, then select an outline structure before the tool writes the complete post.

The blog idea and outline stages work well. The tool generated headlines like "How to Create a Sales Page for an Online Course: 4 Tips to Better Conversions" and outlines with logical section breakdowns covering topics like building trust, making strong first impressions, and creating compelling calls to action.

The full article generation is where things fall apart. Labeled as beta at the time, it showed. The first attempt threw an error after 90 seconds of processing and required a page refresh. The second attempt did produce output — around 1,560 words — but the quality dropped significantly compared to CopySmith's short-form output.

Long-Form Content Quality

The long-form article output highlighted the limitations of GPT-3 for extended writing. While the structure followed the outline correctly, the actual advice was often questionable or outright wrong. For example, the tool recommended writing "short, concise sales pages" for online courses — the opposite of what actually works for high-ticket digital products, which typically need extensive copy to justify the investment.

Scattered throughout the article were awkward GPT-3 artifacts: phrases like "if you're still with me, I won't bother you with the details" and sentences that simply trailed off mid-thought. Some passages contradicted themselves or made claims that didn't hold up, like suggesting you'd "lose credibility" if your sales page wasn't perfect.

The presentation needed work too — no visible paragraph spacing, text stretching the full width of the screen, and no way to toggle word count within the editor. The outline was arguably the most useful output from the entire long-form workflow, giving you a solid structural foundation to write from yourself rather than relying on the AI to flesh everything out.

AIDA Framework Output

The AIDA (Attention, Interest, Desire, Action) framework template is a solid addition to CopySmith's toolkit. It requires just a company name and description as inputs, making it one of the simplest templates to use. The results showed a clear improvement over Copy.ai's AIDA output, particularly in the "Attention" section.

Where Copy.ai tended to generate blog-style intros for the attention-grabbing headline, CopySmith actually produced punchy headlines: "Get the full picture of each tool before you invest your time, money, and effort into a business opportunity" reads like something you'd see on an actual landing page. Not every output was a hit — "If you love to learn but hate to master" is confusing rather than compelling — but the overall direction was right.

The call-to-action sections also delivered properly formatted CTAs like "Sign up for our newsletter today" and "Start your free membership today," rather than the vague suggestions some other tools produce. For anyone building landing pages or sales emails, the AIDA template alone could justify a subscription.

Pricing and Value

CopySmith's pricing was structured across three tiers. The Starter plan came in at $19 per month ($16/month annually), giving you 20 credits and 20 plagiarism checks along with access to the Chrome extension. The Professional plan at $59 per month unlocked unlimited credits and 100 long-form blog generations per month. An Enterprise tier with unlimited everything required contacting sales for pricing.

At these price points, CopySmith represented strong value in the GPT-3 copywriting space — particularly at the $19 starter tier for anyone focused on short-form content like product descriptions and ad copy. The lack of team or collaboration features was a notable gap, meaning businesses would need to share logins rather than manage multiple seats properly.

Plagiarism Testing

Every AI writing tool needs to pass the plagiarism test, and CopySmith cleared it cleanly. Running the full 1,560-word blog article through CopyScape returned zero matches — no plagiarized content detected. The built-in plagiarism checker within CopySmith also confirmed uniqueness, checking 95 words of selected text and reporting a pass.

The built-in checker is limited by your plan's allocation (20 checks on the Starter plan), but it's a convenient way to spot-check outputs without switching to an external tool. It likely uses CopyScape's API behind the scenes, which means you're getting the same level of detection without the extra step.

Final Verdict

CopySmith turned out to be a genuine surprise. The short-form content generation — product descriptions, blog ideas, and AIDA frameworks — was consistently better than Copy.ai at the time of testing. The user interface felt more thoughtful, with features like template previews, folder organization, and multiple export formats that showed real attention to the user experience.

The long-form article writing assistant was the weak point, producing content that needed significant human editing to be publishable. But the three-step workflow (idea → outline → article) was a smart approach, and the outline stage alone provided real value as a starting point for writing your own content.

For anyone in the market for a GPT-3 copywriting assistant focused primarily on short-form marketing copy, CopySmith was one of the strongest options available at its price point. The AI copywriting landscape has evolved significantly since this review, so be sure to check the current alternatives if you're shopping for a tool today.

Watch the Full Video

Prefer watching to reading? Check out the full video on YouTube for a complete walkthrough with live demos and commentary.