Project.co Review: Project Management with Client Portal

Project.co offers simple project management with built-in client portals and Stripe payment collection. This review tests task management, file sharing, and client experience. Covers real agency use and how it compares to Asana and Monday for client-facing work.

project co
This article contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through these links, I may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. I only recommend tools I genuinely use and believe in.

Project.co

6.3 /10
What it does

A project management tool designed for managing client and internal projects with built-in discussion, invoicing, and time tracking.

Who it's for

Freelancers, small agencies, and digital marketing teams who need a simple way to manage client projects and communication in one place.

Compares to

ClickUp, Asana, Basecamp, Teamwork

What Is Project.co and What's the AppSumo Deal?

Project.co is a project management platform built around simplifying communication between your internal team and your clients. It landed on AppSumo as a lifetime deal starting at $49 per code, with the ability to stack up to 10 codes.

Each code maps to Project.co's Small plan and gives you 10 additional users and 25 GB of file storage. All other features — unlimited projects, unlimited tasks, and unlimited external users (for clients) — come included regardless of how many codes you buy. So the real question when deciding how many codes to grab is simply how large your internal team is. Ten codes gets you up to 100 internal users.

It's worth noting that Project.co also offers a free forever plan for teams of three or fewer members with 1 GB of storage. If you're a solo operator or a tiny partnership, you might not even need the AppSumo deal at all.

Pricing Tiers and the Small Plan Caveat

One important detail: the AppSumo deal locks you into the Small plan tier regardless of how many codes you stack. Project.co has three tiers — Free, Small, Medium, and Large — and right now all features are included across all plans. That sounds great, but it's worth thinking about the long-term implications.

Companies frequently add premium features to higher tiers as they mature. If Project.co introduces advanced functionality down the road and reserves it for Medium or Large plans, your lifetime deal won't cover it. You'd have to abandon the LTD and upgrade to a paid monthly plan to access those features. It's speculation, but it's a pattern that plays out often in the SaaS world, so buy with that risk in mind.

Custom Domain and Branding Setup

The deal page advertises a "custom domain name," which initially sounds like you can map Project.co to your own subdomain — something like projects.youragency.com. During the initial setup wizard, that's not what you get. By default, you receive a subdomain under their domain, like youragency.project.co.

However, buried in the workspace settings is a CNAME configuration option that does let you point your own custom subdomain to your Project.co workspace. It's just not surfaced during onboarding, which makes the feature easy to miss. Once you find it, setup is straightforward: enter your custom domain and add a CNAME record in your DNS settings.

Branding is similarly tucked away in workspace settings rather than the setup wizard. You can upload a custom logo, internal project image, and favicon. Once configured, your logo appears in the navigation and alongside your projects, giving the platform a white-labeled feel that works well for agencies managing multiple client accounts.

Project Organization: Simple but Maybe Too Simple

Project.co takes a minimalist approach to organization. A project contains tasks, and that's it. There are no sub-tasks, sub-lists, folders within folders, or nested hierarchies. If you've ever been frustrated by overly complex project management tools with endless layers of nesting, you might find this refreshing. If you need that depth, you'll find it limiting.

Projects can be viewed in list or Kanban format, with tasks flowing through the custom statuses you define — things like Open, In Progress, Ready for Review, and Approved. There's also a calendar view showing tasks by due date and a scheduler view that lets you drag tasks across a timeline to adjust their duration visually. The scheduler is a standout feature; it's more intuitive than the typical dropdown date-picker approach used by tools like ClickUp.

Each project includes tabs for Discussion (visible to clients on external projects), Notes (private to your internal team), Tasks, Internal Users, Time Tracking, and Project Settings. The separation between Discussion and Notes is a thoughtful touch for agencies that need to keep internal conversations private while collaborating openly with clients.

Tasks, Statuses, and the Template Problem

Tasks are straightforward to create — assign a name, group, privacy setting, and due date, and you're off. You can customize project statuses per project, which is useful because a copywriting project has a very different workflow than a web development project. For example, you might set up Outline, First Draft, Revision, and Final Delivery for copy work.

The problem is reusability. There's no way to save a set of project statuses as a template, and there's no option to duplicate or clone a project. If your agency runs the same type of engagement repeatedly — say, SEO audits or website builds — you'd have to manually recreate the project structure, statuses, and task lists every single time. For anyone with standard operating procedures, this is a significant gap.

It's also worth noting that project statuses and task statuses are separate systems, which isn't made clear during setup. You configure them in different places, and they serve different purposes. Project statuses track the overall project lifecycle, while task statuses track individual to-do items within a project.

Time Tracking and File Management

Time tracking exists but is entirely manual. You estimate how many hours a project should take, allocate hours by group, and then manually log time entries after the fact. There's no timer, no desktop app integration, and no automatic tracking. If you're disciplined about recording your hours as you go, it works. If you tend to jump between tasks or forget to log time, it won't give you accurate data.

File management is similarly bare-bones. You can't upload files directly to a central file library — files must be attached to specific projects through the project details editor. The file section in the main navigation simply aggregates files across projects. File names get modified with dates on upload, files can't be previewed inline, and there's no public sharing link. You can delete files to free up storage, but that's about it. If you need serious file collaboration, you'll want to keep using Dropbox or Google Drive alongside Project.co.

Client Collaboration and Stripe Invoicing

Where Project.co differentiates itself is client-facing features. External projects let you invite clients directly into the workspace where they can participate in discussions, view project progress, and — if you enable payments — pay invoices directly through Stripe.

Setting up invoicing requires linking your Stripe account in workspace settings and enabling payments. Once configured, you can create payment requests on any external project with a description and amount. The client sees the invoice when they log in and can pay it right there through your connected Stripe account. It's clean and simple.

That said, whether you want billing inside your project management tool is a matter of preference. For freelancers handling everything solo, it's convenient to have projects and invoicing in one place. For agencies where the production team and the billing team are separate, mixing the two can create unnecessary complexity. The option to keep payments disabled by default is a smart design choice.

User Roles and Permissions

Project.co offers reasonable role-based access control with four user types: Account Owner, Manager, Team Member, and Contractor. Account Owners have full access. Managers can see and invite users and delete time entries and comments. Team Members can access all public projects and edit project details. Contractors get the most restricted access — they can only see tasks and data specifically assigned to them.

You can also classify users as Clients, Contractors, or Team Members, which determines their visibility into your workspace. Clients only see projects created for their company, contractors only see their assigned tasks, and team members see everything. This segmentation is important for agencies working with external contractors who shouldn't have visibility into other client accounts.

Bugs and Stability Concerns

Throughout testing, several bugs cropped up repeatedly. System errors appeared when navigating to the internal users tab, Kanban drag-and-drop threw "no method requested" errors, the setup wizard didn't carry group settings through to user profiles, and file uploads gave no visual feedback during the process. These aren't catastrophic issues, but they add up to a frustrating experience and raise questions about the platform's maturity.

For a tool you're going to rely on daily to manage real client work, stability matters. The bugs encountered during this review suggest Project.co is still in an early stage of development where rough edges haven't been fully polished.

Final Verdict: Is Project.co Worth It?

Project.co earns a 6.3 out of 10. It's a decent tool that's clearly still finding its footing. The client portal and Stripe invoicing integration are genuinely useful differentiators, and the simple organizational model will appeal to people overwhelmed by more complex platforms. The scheduler view is a nice touch for visual planners.

However, the lack of project templates, limited file management, manual-only time tracking, and recurring bugs make it hard to recommend as a primary project management solution right now. For $49 as a lifetime deal, it might be worth grabbing a single code to sit on while the product matures — especially since comparable tools like Asana Premium would cost you $100/month for a 10-person team.

But if you need a production-ready tool today, ClickUp and Asana both offer robust free tiers with significantly more features and stability. ClickUp gives you unlimited users on their free plan, and Asana supports up to 15 free members. Either is a safer bet for managing real client work right now.


Watch the Full Video

Prefer watching to reading? Check out the full video on YouTube for a complete walkthrough with live demos and commentary.


Frequently Asked Questions

What is Project.co?

Project.co is a project management tool with a built-in client portal. It combines task management, file sharing, messaging, and client access in one platform designed for service businesses.

Does Project.co include a client portal?

Yes, Project.co provides a client-facing portal where clients can view project progress, leave feedback, approve deliverables, and communicate with your team without needing separate tools.

How does Project.co compare to Asana?

Project.co is simpler than Asana and specifically designed for client-facing project management. Asana is more powerful for internal team workflows but lacks built-in client portal features.

Can Project.co replace email for client communication?

Project.co centralizes client communication within project contexts, reducing email back-and-forth. However, some clients may still prefer email for certain types of communication.

Is the Project.co lifetime deal worth it?

For agencies and freelancers managing client projects, the lifetime deal eliminates monthly per-user fees while providing professional client-facing project management capabilities.

Get Dave's Toolbox

The tools I actually use, every Tuesday. Free. No spam.

Thanks for subscribing! Emails land every Tuesday and Friday.

No cost. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Share this post

Search